Legal Opinion
Gonzalez v. Kalu
California Court of Appeal
Decided June 2, 2006No. B183467PublishedCited by 24 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
CROSKEY, J.
Gabriela Gonzalez appeals a summary judgment in a legal malpractice action based on the statute of limitations, Code of Civil Procedure section 340.6. After filing an administrative complaint against her employer with the Department of Fair Employment and Housing (DFEH) and telling Gonzalez that the case would take a very long time and that he would call her or send her a letter, Emelike I. Kalu had no contact with Gonzalez for almost three years. Gonzalez contends the limitations period was tolled or did not commence during the time Kalu failed to communicate with her. We…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Miller v. Department of CorrectionsCalifornia Supreme Court · 2005
- Shumsky v. EisensteinNew York Court of Appeals · 2001
- Laird v. BlackerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1992
- Greene v. GreeneNew York Court of Appeals · 1982
- Jordache Enterprises Inc. v. BrobeckCalifornia Supreme Court · 1998
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by24 opinions
- Transport Insurance v. TIG InsuranceCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2012
- Beach TV Props., Inc. v. SolomonCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2018
- Lockton v. O'ROURKECalifornia Court of Appeal · 2010
- Nielsen v. BeckCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2008
- In re the Suspension of JosephSupreme Court of The Virgin Islands · 2012
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.