Legal Opinion

Miller v. Department of Corrections

California Supreme Court

Decided July 18, 2005No. S114097PublishedCited by 230 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

GEORGE, C. J.

Plaintiffs, two former employees at the Valley State Prison for Women, claim that the warden of the prison at which they were employed accorded unwarranted favorable treatment to numerous female employees with whom the warden was having sexual affairs, and that such conduct constituted sexual harassment in violation of the California Fair Employment and Housing Act (FEHA). (Gov. Code, § 12900 et seq.) The trial court granted summary judgment in favor of defendants, concluding that the conduct in question did not support a claim of sexual harassment, and the Court of Appeal…

2Cases cited30 opinions

  1. Harris v. Forklift Systems, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1993
  2. Meritor Savings Bank, FSB v. VinsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  3. Burlington Industries, Inc. v. EllerthSupreme Court of the United States · 1998
  4. Oncale v. Sundowner Offshore Services, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1998
  5. Aguilar v. Atlantic Richfield Co.California Supreme Court · 2001

25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by230 opinions

  1. Yanowitz v. L'OREAL USA, INC.California Supreme Court · 2005
  2. Hughes v. PairCalifornia Supreme Court · 2009
  3. Roby v. McKesson Corp.California Supreme Court · 2009
  4. Wilson v. 21st Century InsuranceCalifornia Supreme Court · 2007
  5. Lyle v. Warner Brothers Television ProductionsCalifornia Supreme Court · 2006

225 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API