Legal Opinion

Bauman v. Schmitter

Ohio Court of Appeals

Decided November 3, 1989No. 56160PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtPatton, J.

Defendant-appellant, Albert Schmitter, appeals from a jury verdict rendered in favor of plaintiff-appellee, Jenny Bauman, in a negligence action evolving from an automobile collision.

Appellee was injured when appellant’s automobile crossed the center line of a two-lane road and collided head-on with an automobile in which appellee was a passenger. Appellant denied negligence on the basis that he was confronted with a sudden emergency as he tried to avoid hitting a dog in his path. The jury found that although appellant was confronted by a sudden emergency which excused his negligence,…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Schade v. Carnegie Body Co.Ohio Supreme Court · 1982
  2. Grossnickle v. Village of GermantownOhio Supreme Court · 1965
  3. Becker v. BancOhio National BankOhio Supreme Court · 1985
  4. Prendergast v. GinsburgOhio Supreme Court · 1928
  5. Hogan v. FinchOhio Supreme Court · 1966

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Hager v. Norfolk Western, Unpublished Decision (12-14-2006)Ohio Court of Appeals · 2006
  2. Gallick v. BentonOhio Court of Appeals · 2018
  3. Altvater v. Claycraft Co.Ohio Court of Appeals · 1994
  4. Hatala v. CraftOhio Court of Appeals · 2006
  5. Rimsky v. SniderOhio Court of Appeals · 1997

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API