Legal Opinion

Grossnickle v. Village of Germantown

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided July 7, 1965No. 38695PublishedCited by 52 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtSchneider, J.

The cases and comments abound with discussion as to which view of the “per diem” or “mathematical” argument represents the weight of authority in this country. See Annotation, 60 A. L. R. 2d 1347, 1350; 28 Univ. of Cincinnati L. Rev. 138. Nevertheless, a majority of this court is persuaded to adopt a rule favorable to its use, under proper circumstances, by the force of the reasoning expressed in a number of opinions of our sister state courts. Corkery v. Greenberg, *99253 Iowa 846, 854, 114 N. W. 2d 327; 1 Caley v. Manicke, 29 Ill. App. 2d 323, 336, 173 N. E. 2d 209; 2 Four-County Electric Power *100As…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Four-County Electric Power Ass'n v. ClardyMississippi Supreme Court · 1954
  2. Indiana Natural Gas & Oil Co. v. O'BrienIndiana Supreme Court · 1903
  3. Caley v. ManickeAppellate Court of Illinois · 1961
  4. City of Jacksonville v. StokesSupreme Court of Florida · 1954
  5. Deane v. JohnstonSupreme Court of Florida · 1958

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by52 opinions

  1. Texler v. D.O. Summers Cleaners & Shirt Laundry Co.Ohio Supreme Court · 1998
  2. Stone v. DavisOhio Supreme Court · 1981
  3. Di Gildo v. CaponiOhio Supreme Court · 1969
  4. McGuire v. Sears, Roebuck & Co.Ohio Court of Appeals · 1996
  5. Brandy Andler v. Clear Channel Broadcasting, IncCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2012

47 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API