Hogan v. Finch
Ohio Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtZimmerman, J.
We recognize that the so-called “guest statute,” Section 4515.02, Revised Code, is a part of the law of Ohio and should be recognized. We also recognize that there are close cases wherein that statute is not applicable.
In the instant case, the jury was fully advised in the special and general charges as to the difference between a “guest” and a “passenger” in a motor vehicle, and that, in order to recover, the burden rested on plaintiff to establish her status as a passenger.
The charges as given are in substantial conformity with *36prior decisions of this court. See, for example, Dorn, Admr.,…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Dorn v. Village of North OlmstedOhio Supreme Court · 1938
- Board of Commissioners v. DeitschOhio Supreme Court · 1916
- Prendergast v. GinsburgOhio Supreme Court · 1928
3Cited by13 opinions
- Becker v. BancOhio National BankOhio Supreme Court · 1985
- Sowards v. Norbar, Inc.Ohio Court of Appeals · 1992
- Coleman v. Excello-Textron Corp.Ohio Court of Appeals · 1989
- Pierce v. DurraniOhio Court of Appeals · 2015
- Stiltner v. BahnerOhio Supreme Court · 1967
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.