Schade v. Carnegie Body Co.
Ohio Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtReilly, J.
Appellant advances four propositions of law:
1. “Where a party has specifically waived all objections to jury instructions requested by the opposing party, an Appeals Court may not base reversal of a jury verdict on a jury instruction given pursuant to that waiver.”
2. “In the absence of plain error, an Appeals Court may not base reversal of a jury verdict on a jury instruction neither assigned as error by appellant nor objected to at trial.”
3. “It is the duty of the Trial Court to properly and fully instruct the jury as to the vital issues in the case as raised by the pleadings and the…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- State v. LongOhio Supreme Court · 1978
- Erdman v. MestrovichOhio Supreme Court · 1951
- Youngstown Municipal Ry. Co. v. MikulaOhio Supreme Court · 1936
3Cited by279 opinions
- Galmish v. CicchiniOhio Supreme Court · 2000
- LeFort v. Century 21-Maitland Realty Co.Ohio Supreme Court · 1987
- Reichert v. IngersollOhio Supreme Court · 1985
- Goldfuss v. DavidsonOhio Supreme Court · 1997
- Leber v. SmithOhio Supreme Court · 1994
274 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.