Legal Opinion

Hager v. Norfolk Western, Unpublished Decision (12-14-2006)

Ohio Court of Appeals

Decided December 14, 2006No. 87553UnpublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

JUDGMENT: AFFIRMED IN PART, REVERSED IN PART

{¶ 1} Appellant Norfolk Western Railway Co. ("Norfolk") appeals the jury's verdict in favor of the appellee, the Estate of Eugene Hager1 ("Hager"), and the trial court's post-verdict rulings. Norfolk assigns nine errors for our review.2

{¶ 2} Having reviewed the record and pertinent law, we affirm in part and reverse in part the decision of the trial court. We remand the case to the trial court to reduce the verdict by the appropriate set-off amount. The apposite facts follow.

{¶ 3} On May 16, 2000, Mr. Hager filed a complaint against Norfolk pursuant…

2Cases cited36 opinions

  1. State v. AdamsOhio Supreme Court · 1980
  2. Strother v. HutchinsonOhio Supreme Court · 1981
  3. State v. LeonardOhio Supreme Court · 2004
  4. State v. HancockOhio Supreme Court · 2006
  5. Berk v. MatthewsOhio Supreme Court · 1990

31 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. State v. Hatfield, 2006-A-0033 (12-28-2007)Ohio Court of Appeals · 2007
  2. Thornton v. ConradOhio Court of Appeals · 2011
  3. Meranda Nixon Estate Wine, L.L.C. v. Cherry Fork Farm Supply Co.Ohio Court of Appeals · 2024
  4. Klem v. Consolidated Rail Corp.Ohio Court of Appeals · 2010
  5. State v. McMeenOhio Court of Appeals · 2014

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API