Legal Opinion

Prendergast v. Ginsburg

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided December 5, 1928No. 21078PublishedCited by 19 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Allen J.

Plaintiff in error maintains that the answers to the interrogatories, when construed together, are consistent with the general verdict, -and that therefore the general verdict in favor of the plaintiff below should be sustained. She also urges that the Court of Appeals considered the evidence when construing the interrogatories in connection with the general verdict, and therein committed error. Board of Commissioners of Mercer County v. Deitsch, 94 Ohio St., 1, 113 N. E., 745. It has been heretofore held by this court, in cases involving the liability of a landlord for injuries…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. O'Connor v. AndrewsTexas Supreme Court · 1891
  2. Payne v. IrvinIllinois Supreme Court · 1893
  3. Davies v. KelleyOhio Supreme Court · 1925
  4. Wilcox v. ZaneMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1897
  5. Perry v. LevySupreme Court of New Jersey · 1915

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by19 opinions

  1. Tyrrell v. Investment Associates, Inc.Ohio Court of Appeals · 1984
  2. Becker v. BancOhio National BankOhio Supreme Court · 1985
  3. New York Life Ins. Co. v. SeighmanCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1944
  4. Hogan v. FinchOhio Supreme Court · 1966
  5. Coleman v. Excello-Textron Corp.Ohio Court of Appeals · 1989

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API