Legal Opinion

Alaska Exchange Carriers Association, Inc. v. Regulatory Com'n

Alaska Supreme Court

Decided February 27, 2009No. S-12696PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

WINFREE, Justice.

I. INTRODUCTION

A local telephone company proposed moving its first point of switching for routing telephone traffic. Two long-distance carriers affected by the proposal opposed the change, and an association of local telephone companies sought to intervene in the ensuing regulatory proceeding. The agency denied intervention, the superior court affirmed, and the association appeals. We affirm denial of intervention because the agency reasonably concluded that the association did not qualify for mandatory intervention and did not abuse its discretion in denying…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Tesoro Alaska Petroleum Co. v. Kenai Pipe Line Co.Alaska Supreme Court · 1987
  2. Matanuska-Susitna Borough v. HammondAlaska Supreme Court · 1986
  3. Cook Inlet Pipe Line Co. v. Alaska Public Utilities CommissionAlaska Supreme Court · 1992
  4. Tlingit-Haida Regional Electrical Authority v. StateAlaska Supreme Court · 2001
  5. Hodges v. Alaska Constructors, Inc.Alaska Supreme Court · 1998

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Titus v. State, Dept. of Administration, Division of Motor VehiclesAlaska Supreme Court · 2013
  2. Alaska Community Action on Toxics v. HartigAlaska Supreme Court · 2014
  3. North Slope Borough and North Slope Borough School District v. State of Alaska, Department of Education and Early DevelopmentAlaska Supreme Court · 2021
  4. Alaska Exchange Carriers Ass'n v. Regulatory CommissionAlaska Supreme Court · 2011
  5. Alaska Police Standards Council v. ParcellAlaska Supreme Court · 2015

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API