Legal Opinion
Alaska Exchange Carriers Ass'n v. Regulatory Commission
Alaska Supreme Court
Decided October 7, 2011No. S-13528PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
CHRISTEN, Justice.
I. INTRODUCTION
Six weeks after the Regulatory Commission of Alaska approved the 2007 Access Charge Rates long distance telephone companies pay to local telephone companies, an association of local telephone companies realized that five of the rates the Regulatory Commission approved were based upon an erroneous spreadsheet the association included in its rate filings. The association requested that the Regulatory Commission correct the rates. The Regulatory Commission corrected the rates prospectively, but concluded retrospective application was barred by this court’s…
Also in this document: Concurring in part, dissenting in part.
2Cases cited19 opinions
- Tesoro Alaska Petroleum Co. v. Kenai Pipe Line Co.Alaska Supreme Court · 1987
- Public Utility Commission v. GTE-Southwest, Inc.Texas Supreme Court · 1995
- Application of MinnegascoSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1997
- Storrs v. State Medical BoardAlaska Supreme Court · 1983
- Amerada Hess Pipeline Corp. v. Alaska Public Utilities CommissionAlaska Supreme Court · 1986
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Alaska Fish & Wildlife Conservation Fund v. State, Department of Fish & Game, Board of FisheriesAlaska Supreme Court · 2012
- State, Dept. of Natural Resources v. Alaskan Crude CorporationAlaska Supreme Court · 2018
- State v. EstradaCourt of Appeals of Alaska · 2013
- Alaska Exchange Carriers Ass'n v. Regulatory CommissionAlaska Supreme Court · 2011
- State of Alaska, Department of Natural Resources v. Alaskan Crude Corporation and James M. White, James M. White v. State of Alaska, DNR, and Alaskan Crude Corp.Alaska Supreme Court · 2018