Legal Opinion

Tlingit-Haida Regional Electrical Authority v. State

Alaska Supreme Court

Decided January 12, 2001No. S-8833, S-8834, S-8843PublishedCited by 21 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

BRYNER, Justice.

I. INTRODUCTION

Twenty-five years after it created overlapping service territory between two utilities that later became the Tlingit-Haida Regional Electrical Authority (THREA) and the Alaska Power Company, the Alaska Public Utility Commission (commission) eliminated the overlap in favor of Alaska Power. THREA appeals, alleging that the commission's decision is procedurally flawed, is substantively wrong, is preempted by federal law, and results in a taking of THREA's property without just compensation. Alaska Power, the commission, and Klawock cross-appeal on the…

2Cases cited23 opinions

  1. Rice v. Santa Fe Elevator Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1947
  2. Arkansas Electric Cooperative Corp. v. Arkansas Public Service CommissionSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
  3. Bowen v. Public Agencies Opposed to Social Security EntrapmentSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  4. City & Borough of Juneau v. ThibodeauAlaska Supreme Court · 1979
  5. Pan American Petroleum Corp. v. Shell Oil Co.Alaska Supreme Court · 1969

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by21 opinions

  1. City of Cookeville, Tennessee v. Upper Cumberland Electric Membership CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2007
  2. Catalina Yachts v. PierceAlaska Supreme Court · 2005
  3. Matanuska Electric Ass'n v. Chugach Electric Ass'nAlaska Supreme Court · 2002
  4. Municipality of Anchorage v. AndersonAlaska Supreme Court · 2001
  5. Chugach Electric Ass'n v. Regulatory CommissionAlaska Supreme Court · 2002

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API