Diamond Parking, Inc. v. City of Seattle
Washington Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtRosellini, J.
The City of Seattle requires that any operator of a public garage within the city obtain a license. Such licenses had been issued to City Parking, Inc., United Parking, Inc., and Diamond Parking, Inc. The same persons owned the shares of these corporations and served as officers and directors. In October, 1966, the three merged, with Diamond Parking, Inc., as the surviving corporation. The appellant city demanded that license fees be paid on the locations previously owned by the other two corporations for the unexpired period covered by the licenses which it had issued to the two merged…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Lenci v. City of SeattleWashington Supreme Court · 1964
- Pacific Telephone & Telegraph Co. v. City of SeattleWashington Supreme Court · 1933
- Levinson v. LindermanWashington Supreme Court · 1958
- State v. Lake City Bowlers' Club, Inc.Washington Supreme Court · 1946
- United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co. v. City of MontesanoWashington Supreme Court · 1931
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by15 opinions
- Weden v. San Juan CountyWashington Supreme Court · 1998
- Brown v. City of YakimaWashington Supreme Court · 1991
- Margola Associates v. City of SeattleWashington Supreme Court · 1993
- City of Seattle v. WilliamsWashington Supreme Court · 1995
- Southwick, Inc. v. City of LaceyCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1990
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.