Legal Opinion

Brown v. City of Yakima

Washington Supreme Court

Decided March 28, 1991No. 56952-5PublishedCited by 87 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtDurham, J.

Appellants 1 challenge the constitutionality of a Yakima city ordinance contending that it either is preempted by, or is in direct conflict with, the state fireworks law, RCW 70.77. Upon cross motions for summary judgment, which were limited by stipulation to the legal question of constitutionality under Const. art. 11, § 11, the trial court upheld the ordinance, granted summary judgment in favor of Yakima, and dismissed Brown's claim. Brown appealed and this court granted his motion to transfer. We affirm.

Washington's state fireworks law is codified at RCW 70.77. RCW 70.77.395, with certain…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. City of Seattle v. EzeWashington Supreme Court · 1988
  2. Lenci v. City of SeattleWashington Supreme Court · 1964
  3. Petstel, Inc. v. County of KingWashington Supreme Court · 1969
  4. City of Bellingham v. SchamperaWashington Supreme Court · 1960
  5. Kreidler v. EikenberryWashington Supreme Court · 1989

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by87 opinions

  1. CJC v. Corporation of Catholic BishopWashington Supreme Court · 1999
  2. City of Tacoma v. LuveneWashington Supreme Court · 1992
  3. Covell v. City of SeattleWashington Supreme Court · 1995
  4. Weden v. San Juan CountyWashington Supreme Court · 1998
  5. Weden v. San Juan CountyWashington Supreme Court · 1998

82 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API