Southwick, Inc. v. City of Lacey
Court of Appeals of Washington
1Opinion of the CourtReed, J.
— Southwick, Inc. (Southwick) appeals the imposition of conditions on a proposed development, contending that the City unlawfully delegated authority; that the conditions are unauthorized taxes or fees; and that the proceedings violated due process. We affirm.
The City of Lacey follows a 2-step process in approving conditional uses of property: first allowing for issuance of the conditional use permit, and then performing a site-specific review of a detailed proposal for development. The Site Plan Review Committee reviews the specific development plans for compliance with city standards and…
2Cases cited20 opinions
- Hillis Homes, Inc. v. Snohomish CountyWashington Supreme Court · 2002
- City of Bellingham v. SchamperaWashington Supreme Court · 1960
- Chrobuck v. Snohomish CountyWashington Supreme Court · 1971
- R/L ASSOCIATES, INC. v. City of SeattleWashington Supreme Court · 1989
- Lutz v. City of LongviewWashington Supreme Court · 1974
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by30 opinions
- Weden v. San Juan CountyWashington Supreme Court · 1998
- Weden v. San Juan CountyWashington Supreme Court · 1998
- Isla Verde International Holdings, Inc. v. City of CamasWashington Supreme Court · 2002
- Rivett v. City of TacomaWashington Supreme Court · 1994
- Margola Associates v. City of SeattleWashington Supreme Court · 1993
25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.