Pacific Telephone & Telegraph Co. v. City of Seattle
Washington Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtBlake, J.
The plaintiff brought this action to enjoin the defendant from collecting a license tax under ordinance No. 62,662, being entitled:
“An ordinance relating to, and providing for, a license or occupation tax upon certain businesses, occupations, pursuits and privileges; defining offenses and providing penalties. ’ ’
A demurrer interposed to the amended complaint was sustained. The plaintiff, electing to stand on the pleading, appeals from a judgment dismissing the action, and assigns error as follows:
“ (1) The court erred in sustaining respondents’ demurrer to appellant’s amended complaint.
“(2)…
2Cases cited26 opinions
- Minot v. Philadelphia, Wilmington & Baltimore RailroadSupreme Court of the United States · 1874
- Hope Natural Gas Co. v. Hall, State Tax CommissionerSupreme Court of the United States · 1927
- State ex rel. Webster v. Superior CourtWashington Supreme Court · 1912
- Postal Telegraph Cable Co. v. CharlestonSupreme Court of the United States · 1894
- Williams v. City of TalladegaSupreme Court of the United States · 1913
21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by44 opinions
- Lenci v. City of SeattleWashington Supreme Court · 1964
- Margola Associates v. City of SeattleWashington Supreme Court · 1993
- State Ex Rel. Stiner v. YelleWashington Supreme Court · 1933
- State Ex Rel. Pac. T. T. Co. v. D.P.S.Washington Supreme Court · 1943
- Culliton v. ChaseWashington Supreme Court · 1933
39 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.