Legal Opinion

Pacific Telephone & Telegraph Co. v. City of Seattle

Washington Supreme Court

Decided April 21, 1933No. 24327. En BancPublishedCited by 44 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBlake, J.

The plaintiff brought this action to enjoin the defendant from collecting a license tax under ordinance No. 62,662, being entitled:

“An ordinance relating to, and providing for, a license or occupation tax upon certain businesses, occupations, pursuits and privileges; defining offenses and providing penalties. ’ ’

A demurrer interposed to the amended complaint was sustained. The plaintiff, electing to stand on the pleading, appeals from a judgment dismissing the action, and assigns error as follows:

“ (1) The court erred in sustaining respondents’ demurrer to appellant’s amended complaint.
“(2)…

2Cases cited26 opinions

  1. Minot v. Philadelphia, Wilmington & Baltimore RailroadSupreme Court of the United States · 1874
  2. Hope Natural Gas Co. v. Hall, State Tax CommissionerSupreme Court of the United States · 1927
  3. State ex rel. Webster v. Superior CourtWashington Supreme Court · 1912
  4. Postal Telegraph Cable Co. v. CharlestonSupreme Court of the United States · 1894
  5. Williams v. City of TalladegaSupreme Court of the United States · 1913

21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by44 opinions

  1. Lenci v. City of SeattleWashington Supreme Court · 1964
  2. Margola Associates v. City of SeattleWashington Supreme Court · 1993
  3. State Ex Rel. Stiner v. YelleWashington Supreme Court · 1933
  4. State Ex Rel. Pac. T. T. Co. v. D.P.S.Washington Supreme Court · 1943
  5. Culliton v. ChaseWashington Supreme Court · 1933

39 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API