Legal Opinion

United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co. v. City of Montesano

Washington Supreme Court

Decided February 3, 1931No. 22631. Department TwoPublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtMillard, J.

The surety on the bond of the contractors who constructed a bridge for the city of Mon-tesano paid a materialman’s lien, timely filed, against that bond. Before the filing of that claim of lien, and prior to the expiration of thirty days after the acceptance of the bridge, the city paid the contractors the retained percentage on the contract. Alleging the foregoing facts, the surety instituted this action against the city, to recover the amount the city was required by the contract and by the statute to retain for thirty days after the acceptance of the bridge. Trial of the cause resulted in…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Northwestern National Bank v. Guardian Casualty & Guaranty Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1916
  2. Maryland Casualty Co. v. Washington National BankWashington Supreme Court · 1916
  3. State ex rel. Bartelt v. LiebesWashington Supreme Court · 1898
  4. Dowling v. City of SeattleWashington Supreme Court · 1900
  5. Van Doren Roofing & Cornice Co. v. Guardian Casualty & Guaranty Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1917

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Republic Nat. Bank & Trust Co. v. Massachusetts Bonding & Ins.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1934
  2. Stover v. Winston Bros. Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1936
  3. Wally Gray and Maryland Casualty Company, a Corporation, and Northern Commercial Company, a Corporation v. Travelers Indemnity Company, a CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1960
  4. Diamond Parking, Inc. v. City of SeattleWashington Supreme Court · 1971
  5. Fidelity & Deposit Co. v. Herbert H. Conway, Inc.Washington Supreme Court · 1942

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API