Legal Opinion
Davis v. Hart
California Supreme Court
Decided August 13, 1894No. 19401PublishedCited by 10 opinions
Appeal from a judgment of the Superior Court of Kern County, and from an order denying a new trial. The facts are stated in the opinion.
1Opinion of the CourtFitzgerald, J.
There is no brief on file by respondent, nor was the case orally argued in his behalf. ■
As the record shows that the findings are attacked by the specifications on the ground of the insufficiency of the evidence to support them, it follows on the authority of Richter v. Fresno Canal etc. Co., 101 Cal. 582, that the judgment and order appealed from should be reversed.
So ordered.
McFarland, J., and De Haven, J., concurred.
2Cases cited1 opinion
- Richter v. Fresno Canal & Irrigation Co.California Supreme Court · 1894
3Cited by10 opinions
- Butler v. McSpaddenSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1910
- Contra Costa Water Co. v. BreedCalifornia Supreme Court · 1903
- Lutz v. Merchants Nat. BankCalifornia Supreme Court · 1918
- Rudd v. WilsonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1912
- Nettograph Machine Co. v. Brown and TruebloodSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1907
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.