Richter v. Fresno Canal & Irrigation Co.
California Supreme Court
Appeal from a judgment of the Superior Court of Fresno County and from an order denying a new trial. The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.
1Opinion of the Court
Fitzgerald, J.—
Action to abate an alleged public
nuisance. Plaintiff had judgment, and the Fresno Mining Company, intervenor, appeals from the judgment and the order denying its motion for a new trial.
It appears that certain material findings in this case are attacked by the specifications on the ground of the insufficiency of the evidence to support them.
But as the respondent herein has not seen fit to file a brief, or to argue the case orally, we do not feel called upon to perform the duty of counsel by hunting through the record for the purpose of discovering evidence to , support the…
2Cited by11 opinions
- Butler v. McSpaddenSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1910
- Lutz v. Merchants Nat. BankCalifornia Supreme Court · 1918
- Rudd v. WilsonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1912
- Davis v. HartCalifornia Supreme Court · 1894
- State Farm Fire & Casualty Co. v. Workers' Compensation Appeals BoardCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1981
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.