Rudd v. Wilson
Supreme Court of Oklahoma
■Error from District Court, Okfuskee County; John Caruthers, Judge. Action by Nellie Rudd against Samuel M. Wilson, Flora A. Wilson, and James C. Smith to recover on a promissory note, and to foreclose a real estate mortgage securing same. Judgment for defendants; plaintiff brings error.
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion by
ROBERTSON, C.
Plaintiff in error has completed her record and filed it in this court on April 10, 1910, and has also filed a brief in support of the assignments of error contained in her petition in error; said brief having been filed on May 11, 1910. Twenty months have elapsed, and defendants in error have not complied with rule 7 of this court (20 Okla. viii, 95 Pac. vi), relative to filing briefs; nor have they offered any excuse for their failure so to do. Counsel for plaintiff in error has filed an able and exhaustive brief in support of his contentions. We do not know upon what…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Ellis v. OutlerSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1910
- Butler v. McSpaddenSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1910
- Chamberlain v. LesleySupreme Court of Florida · 1897
- Buckner v. Oklahoma National Bank of ShawneeSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1910
- Reeves & Co. v. BrennanSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1910
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by12 opinions
- Skaggs v. Ohio Valley Rock Asphalt Co.Court of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1942
- Miles v. BirdSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1914
- Hampton v. ThomasSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1913
- Skelsey v. KuhnArizona Supreme Court · 1922
- Dievert Sch. Bd. of Dist. No. 79 v. RaineySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1913
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.