Legal Opinion

Butler v. McSpadden

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided January 11, 1910No. 250PublishedCited by 48 opinions

Error from District Court, Craig County; John H. King, Judge. Action between John Butler and Mike Martin and S. A. MeSpadden. From the judgment, Butler and Martin bring error.

1Opinion of the CourtDuNN, J.

Tbis case presents error from the district court of Craig county. Among other contentions of counsel for plaintiff in error, it is insisted 'in his brief that the evidence offered on the trial does not sustain the verdict. Counsel for defendani in error have filed no brief, nor offered any excuse for failure. Rule 7 (20 Okla. viii, 95 Pac. vi) provides for the filing of briefs by counsel for parties interested in actions pending here on appeal, and provides, ‘'fin case of failure to comply with the requirements of this rule, the court may continue or dismiss the cause, or reverse or affirm…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Chamberlain v. LesleySupreme Court of Florida · 1897
  2. Richter v. Fresno Canal & Irrigation Co.California Supreme Court · 1894
  3. Davis v. HartCalifornia Supreme Court · 1894
  4. Aldridge v. Board of EducationSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1905
  5. Nettograph Machine Co. v. Brown and TruebloodSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1907

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by48 opinions

  1. School District No. 39, Pottawatomie County v. SheltonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1910
  2. Buckner v. Oklahoma National Bank of ShawneeSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1910
  3. Reeves & Co. v. BrennanSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1910
  4. A. F. Sharpleigh Hardware Co. v. PritchardSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1910
  5. Security Ins. Co. v. DrokeSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1913

43 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API