Legal Opinion

Blitz v. Neuner

Oregon Supreme Court

Decided February 11, 1952PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Per curiam

The petitioners are persons who are dissatisfied with the short ballot title which has been prepared by the Attorney General for a proposed initiative measure which was filed with the Secretary of State on 14 January 1952. The short ballot title so prepared reads as follows: “CONSTITUTIONAL AMENDMENT RELATING TO ALCOHOLIC LIQUOR”. The nature of the proposed constitutional amendment is indicated in the “general title” which reads as follows:

“BALLOT TITLE
“CONSTITUTIONAL AMENDMENT RELATING TO ALCOHOLIC LIQUOR-^-Purpose: To amend the Oregon constitution by adding section 39 to Article I thereof,…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Richardson v. NeunerOregon Supreme Court · 1948
  2. Allen v. Van WinkleOregon Supreme Court · 1931
  3. Dodd v. NEUNER, ATTORNEY GENERALOregon Supreme Court · 1950

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Milwaukie Co. of Jehovah's Witnesses v. MullenOregon Supreme Court · 1958
  2. Kohler v. TugwellDistrict Court, E.D. Louisiana · 1969
  3. Rexnord, Inc. v. FerrisOregon Supreme Court · 1983
  4. Dagwell v. ThorntonOregon Supreme Court · 1953
  5. Columbia River Salmon & Tuna Packers Ass'n v. ThorntonOregon Supreme Court · 1958

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API