Legal Opinion

Richardson v. Neuner

Oregon Supreme Court

Decided June 10, 1948PublishedCited by 29 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtRossman, C. J.

This proceeding, which is authorized by § 81-2106, O. C. L. A., is an appeal by Mr. James J. Richardson, a resident of this state, from a ballot title written by the attorney general for an initiative measure which a group of individuals propose to circulate for signatures.

Article IV, § 1, Constitution of Oregon, and §§ 81-2102 to 81-2120, O. C. L. A., make provision for the enactment of laws through the initiative process. Section 81-2106 provides that the attorney general shall write the ballot title for initiative measures; particularly it says:

“ * * * The ballot title shall contain: (1) A…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Hayburn's CaseSupreme Court of the United States · 1792
  2. In Re School-Law ManualSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1885

3Cited by29 opinions

  1. Milwaukie Co. of Jehovah's Witnesses v. MullenOregon Supreme Court · 1958
  2. Bay v. State Board of EducationOregon Supreme Court · 1963
  3. Dimitroff v. State Industrial Accident CommissionOregon Supreme Court · 1957
  4. Rogue River Packing Corp. v. Department of RevenueOregon Tax Court · 1976
  5. Martin Bros. Container & Timber Products Corp. v. State Tax CommissionOregon Supreme Court · 1969

24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API