Legal Opinion
Dagwell v. Thornton
Oregon Supreme Court
Decided July 8, 1953PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
*9LATOURETTE, C. J.
This is an appeal by Benjamin D. Dagwell, Philip S. Hitchcock, E. J. Ireland, Julins J. Nodel and Thomas J. Tobin, from the action of the Attorney General in fixing a ballot title of a proposed referendum which attacks chapter 495, Oregon Laws 1953, the same being as follows:
“AN ACT
“Relating to discrimination by places of public accommodation, resort or amusement because of race, religion, color or national origin; and providing remedies and penalties therefor.
“Be It Enacted by the People of the State of Oregon:
‘ ‘ Section 1. All persons within the jurisdiction of this state…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Richardson v. NeunerOregon Supreme Court · 1948
- Wieder v. HossOregon Supreme Court · 1933
- Allen v. Van WinkleOregon Supreme Court · 1931
- Blitz v. NeunerOregon Supreme Court · 1952
3Cited by6 opinions
- In Re Petition of Idaho State Fed. of Labor (Afl)Idaho Supreme Court · 1954
- Columbia River Salmon & Tuna Packers Ass'n v. ThorntonOregon Supreme Court · 1958
- Dagwell v. ThorntonOregon Supreme Court · 1953
- In Re Petition of Idaho State Fed. of Labor (Afl)Idaho Supreme Court · 1954
- Rooney v. KulongoskiOregon Supreme Court · 1995
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.