Legal Opinion

Dagwell v. Thornton

Oregon Supreme Court

Decided July 8, 1953PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

*9LATOURETTE, C. J.

This is an appeal by Benjamin D. Dagwell, Philip S. Hitchcock, E. J. Ireland, Julins J. Nodel and Thomas J. Tobin, from the action of the Attorney General in fixing a ballot title of a proposed referendum which attacks chapter 495, Oregon Laws 1953, the same being as follows:

“AN ACT
“Relating to discrimination by places of public accommodation, resort or amusement because of race, religion, color or national origin; and providing remedies and penalties therefor.
“Be It Enacted by the People of the State of Oregon:

‘ ‘ Section 1. All persons within the jurisdiction of this state…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Richardson v. NeunerOregon Supreme Court · 1948
  2. Wieder v. HossOregon Supreme Court · 1933
  3. Allen v. Van WinkleOregon Supreme Court · 1931
  4. Blitz v. NeunerOregon Supreme Court · 1952

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. In Re Petition of Idaho State Fed. of Labor (Afl)Idaho Supreme Court · 1954
  2. Columbia River Salmon & Tuna Packers Ass'n v. ThorntonOregon Supreme Court · 1958
  3. Dagwell v. ThorntonOregon Supreme Court · 1953
  4. In Re Petition of Idaho State Fed. of Labor (Afl)Idaho Supreme Court · 1954
  5. Rooney v. KulongoskiOregon Supreme Court · 1995

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API