Legal Opinion

Columbia River Salmon & Tuna Packers Ass'n v. Thornton

Oregon Supreme Court

Decided May 14, 1958PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Per curiam

The petitioners, Columbia River Salmon & Tuna Packers Association, a corporation, and James H. Cellars, a registered voter of this state, being persons dissatisfied with the ballot title provided by the Attorney General for an initiative measure which has been filed with the Secretary of State (see ORS 254.060, 254.070), have asked this court for correction thereof in accordance with the procedure prescribed in OES 254.080. The measure in question reads as follows:

“BE IT ENACTED BY THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF OREGON:
“1. Steelhead is hereby declared a gamefish in the State of Oregon.
“2. It is…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Davis v. Van WinkleOregon Supreme Court · 1929
  2. Allen v. Van WinkleOregon Supreme Court · 1931
  3. Blitz v. NeunerOregon Supreme Court · 1952
  4. Dagwell v. ThorntonOregon Supreme Court · 1953

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Columbia River Salmon & Tuna Packers Ass'n v. Appling & Make Steelhead a Game Fish, Inc.Oregon Supreme Court · 1962
  2. Bristow v. ThorntonOregon Supreme Court · 1968
  3. Columbia River Salmon & Tuna Packers Ass'n v. Appling & Make Steelhead a Game Fish, Inc.Oregon Supreme Court · 1962

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API