Allen v. Van Winkle
Oregon Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtBelt, J.
This is an appeal from the ruling of the Attorney-General submitting a ballot title for Senate Bill No. 1, passed by the last legislature. The short ballot and general ballot title.s prepared by the Attorney-General are as follows:
Short title: “Rogue River Commercial Pishing Bill.”
General title: “Purpose: To close the Rogue river to commercial fishing; to prohibit fishing, for any kind of fish in Rogue river, its tributaries, or within a radius of three miles from the center of its mouth, in any manner except with rod or line held in the hand and by baited hook or hooks; providing for…
2Cited by7 opinions
- Boucher v. BomhoffAlaska Supreme Court · 1972
- Blitz v. NeunerOregon Supreme Court · 1952
- Dagwell v. ThorntonOregon Supreme Court · 1953
- Columbia River Salmon & Tuna Packers Ass'n v. ThorntonOregon Supreme Court · 1958
- Boucher v. BomhoffAlaska Supreme Court · 1972
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.