Legal Opinion

Allen v. Van Winkle

Oregon Supreme Court

Decided April 14, 1931PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBelt, J.

This is an appeal from the ruling of the Attorney-General submitting a ballot title for Senate Bill No. 1, passed by the last legislature. The short ballot and general ballot title.s prepared by the Attorney-General are as follows:

Short title: “Rogue River Commercial Pishing Bill.”

General title: “Purpose: To close the Rogue river to commercial fishing; to prohibit fishing, for any kind of fish in Rogue river, its tributaries, or within a radius of three miles from the center of its mouth, in any manner except with rod or line held in the hand and by baited hook or hooks; providing for…

2Cited by7 opinions

  1. Boucher v. BomhoffAlaska Supreme Court · 1972
  2. Blitz v. NeunerOregon Supreme Court · 1952
  3. Dagwell v. ThorntonOregon Supreme Court · 1953
  4. Columbia River Salmon & Tuna Packers Ass'n v. ThorntonOregon Supreme Court · 1958
  5. Boucher v. BomhoffAlaska Supreme Court · 1972

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API