Kohler v. Tugwell
District Court, E.D. Louisiana
1Opinion of the Court
RUBIN, District Judge:
Louisiana citizens seek an injunction prohibiting any action under the authority of a state constitutional amendment adopted in 1966 on the ground that the designation of the amendment as it appeared on the state ballot misled voters. Hence, they contend that those who voted in favor of the enactment were deprived of their right to- vote, and were denied both Due Process of Law1 and the right to a Republican Form of Government.2
In 1952 Louisiana’s voters adopted a constitutional amendment to authorize the dedication of state revenues to supplement the financing of a toll…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Baker v. CarrSupreme Court of the United States · 1962
- Reynolds v. SimsSupreme Court of the United States · 1964
- Coleman v. MillerSupreme Court of the United States · 1939
- Luther v. BordenSupreme Court of the United States · 1849
- Taylor and Marshall v. BeckhamSupreme Court of the United States · 1900
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by23 opinions
- Van Sickle v. ShanahanSupreme Court of Kansas · 1973
- Kahalekai v. DoiHawaii Supreme Court · 1979
- Mountain States Legal Foundation v. Denver School District 1District Court, D. Colorado · 1978
- Michael Caruso v. Yamhill County, an Oregon Municipal Corporation, by and Through Its County Commissioner, and State of Oregon, Intervenor-AppellantCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2005
- Burton v. GeorgiaCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1992
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.