Bolinger v. State
Court of Appeals of Minnesota
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
STONEBURNER, Judge.
Appellant contests an order denying his postconviction petition for relief on the grounds that his plea to controlled-substance crime in the second degree was not knowingly and voluntarily made, was inaccurate, and lacked the required factual basis because appellant was questioned about a different offense at the plea hearing. We reverse and remand.
FACTS
In June 1999 appellant Steven Douglas Bolinger made two controlled-substance sales to-an undercover police officer. On June 1, 1999, appellant allegedly sold four “ten-strips” 1 of lysergic acid diethylamide (LSD) to…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- United States v. Paul A. RussellCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1982
- State v. EckerSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1994
- Fox v. StateSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1991
- Perkins v. StateSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1997
- State v. RainerSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1993
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- State v. ByronCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2004
- James v. StateCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2004
- Black v. StateCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2007
- James v. StateCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2004
- State v. ByronCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2004