Legal Opinion
State v. Byron
Court of Appeals of Minnesota
Decided July 13, 2004No. A03-1166PublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
WRIGHT, Judge.
Approximately four years after pleading guilty to third-degree controlled substance crime, respondent moved to withdraw his guilty plea, arguing that the district court’s failure to advise him of the immigration consequences of his guilty plea resulted in a manifest injustice. The district court granted respondent’s motion and sua sponte granted plea withdrawal due to violations of the Vienna Convention. The state challenges the procedural and substantive bases for plea withdrawal. We reverse.
FACTS
Respondent James Stanford Byron, an alien national from Trinidad and…
2Cases cited21 opinions
- Dukes v. StateSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2001
- Alanis v. StateSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1998
- Chapman v. StateSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1968
- State v. WukawitzSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2003
- Jose Marcelo Alberto-Gonzalez v. Immigration and Naturalization ServiceCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2000
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Torres v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 2005
- Black v. StateCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2007
- State v. TurnbullCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2009
- Rew v. BergstromCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2011
- State v. BatchelorCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2010
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.