Black v. State
Court of Appeals of Minnesota
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
WORKE, Judge.
On appeal from an order denying a post-conviction petition, appellant argues that (1) consecutive sentencing was a departure that was not properly supported by offense-related aggravating factors, and (2) his failure to cooperate with the PSI, to appear for sentencing, and to abide by his conditions of release were all offender-related factors that cannot be used to support the departure. We affirm.
FACTS
In May 2000, appellant Robert Alan Black was charged with first-degree controlled-substance crime, in violation of MinmStat. § 152.021, subd. 2a (1998). In September 2001,…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- Williams v. StateSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1985
- Dukes v. StateSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2001
- State v. EckerSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1994
- State v. GasslerSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1993
- Rairdon v. StateSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1996
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- State v. WeaverCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2007
- State v. CubasCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2013
- State of Minnesota v. Arthur Anthony TorgesenCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2017
- State of Minnesota v. Jonathon Michael HoneycuttCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2016
- State v. MontezCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2017