Legal Opinion

Black v. State

Court of Appeals of Minnesota

Decided January 9, 2007No. A06-166, A06-311PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

WORKE, Judge.

On appeal from an order denying a post-conviction petition, appellant argues that (1) consecutive sentencing was a departure that was not properly supported by offense-related aggravating factors, and (2) his failure to cooperate with the PSI, to appear for sentencing, and to abide by his conditions of release were all offender-related factors that cannot be used to support the departure. We affirm.

FACTS

In May 2000, appellant Robert Alan Black was charged with first-degree controlled-substance crime, in violation of MinmStat. § 152.021, subd. 2a (1998). In September 2001,…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Williams v. StateSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1985
  2. Dukes v. StateSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2001
  3. State v. EckerSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1994
  4. State v. GasslerSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1993
  5. Rairdon v. StateSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1996

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. State v. WeaverCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2007
  2. State v. CubasCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2013
  3. State of Minnesota v. Arthur Anthony TorgesenCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2017
  4. State of Minnesota v. Jonathon Michael HoneycuttCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2016
  5. State v. MontezCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2017

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API