Legal Opinion

State v. Rainer

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided July 16, 1993No. C8-92-1595PublishedCited by 41 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

PAGE, Justice.

Appellant brought a petition in Sher-burne County District Court for posteonviction relief from his conviction for first-degree murder in the shooting death of Marla Forrest. Minn.Stat. §§ 590.01-.06 (1992). He argues that he is entitled to postconviction relief because he received ineffective assistance of counsel at his trial, and because he has new evidence which casts doubt on the account of one of the prosecution’s main witnesses. The post-conviction court denied relief to appellant. We affirm.

Joseph Rainer was convicted of premeditated first-degree murder and sentenced to…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  2. McMann v. RichardsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
  3. State v. KnafflaSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1976
  4. State v. JonesSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1986
  5. State v. RainerSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1987

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by41 opinions

  1. Roby v. StateSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1996
  2. State v. EckerSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1994
  3. Rainer v. StateSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1997
  4. Roby v. StateSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1995
  5. Ferguson v. StateSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2002

36 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API