Legal Opinion
Fox v. State
Supreme Court of Minnesota
Decided October 4, 1991No. C8-90-2676PublishedCited by 59 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
YETKA, Justice.
Audie Fox appeals from an order of the Itasca County District Court denying post-conviction relief under Minn.Stat. § 590.04 (1990). Appellant claims that he was unable to participate in his defense during his 1982 first-degree murder trial because of the effects of chlorpromazine (Thorazine), an antipsychotic drug administered to appellant before and during the trial to relieve appellant’s anxiety, hypertension, and auditory hallucinations. We affirm the district court.
An Itasca County grand jury indicted appellant on two counts of first-degree murder 1 in the shooting death…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Drope v. MissouriSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
- State v. KnafflaSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1976
- Gates v. StateSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1987
- Case v. StateSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1985
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by59 opinions
- Michael McCall v. Dennis Benson, WardenCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1997
- Roby v. StateSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1996
- Rainer v. StateSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1997
- Rairdon v. StateSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1996
- Roby v. StateSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1995
54 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.