Legal Opinion
Equal Employment Opportunity Commission v. Howard University
District Court, District of Columbia
Decided September 30, 2014No. Civil Action No. 2012-1186PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION
AMY BERMAN JACKSON, United States District Judge
Plaintiff the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission (“EEOC”) brings this action on behalf of Clarence Muse, alleging that defendant Howard University violated Title I of the Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990, as amended, 42 U.S.C. § 12101 et seq. (2012) (“ADA”), by declining to hire Muse based on his disability. At the time Muse applied to work for defendant, he was suffering from end-stage renal disease and was required to undergo dialysis treatments three times a week. Defendant has moved for summary judgment,…
2Cases cited27 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- McDonnell Douglas Corp. v. GreenSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- Scott v. HarrisSupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- United States v. Diebold, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1962
22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Walden v. Patient-Centered Outcomes Research Inst.Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2018
- United States v. Dynamic Visions, Inc.District Court, District of Columbia · 2016
- Perry-Anderson v. Howard University HospitalDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2016
- Lincoln v. BNSF Railway CompanyDistrict Court, D. Kansas · 2020
- Walden v. Patient-Centered Outcomes Research InstituteDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2018