Legal Opinion

Walden v. Patient-Centered Outcomes Research Institute

District Court, District of Columbia

Decided March 30, 2018No. Civil Action No. 2015-1034Published

1Opinion of the Court

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA APPRILL WALDEN, Plaintiff, v. Civil Action No. 15-1034 (TJK) PATIENT-CENTERED OUTCOMES RESEARCH INSTITUTE, Defendant. MEMORANDUM OPINION Plaintiff Apprill Walden alleges that her former employer, Defendant Patient-Centered Outcomes Research Institute (“PCORI”), violated the District of Columbia Human Rights Act (“DCHRA”),

D.C. Code § 2-1401.01

et seq., by discriminating against her on the basis of her disability and retaliating against her after she requested accommodations for that disability, a protected activity under the statute. ECF…

2Cases cited80 opinions

Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
McDonnell Douglas Corp. v. GreenSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
Texas Department of Community Affairs v. BurdineSupreme Court of the United States · 1981

75 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.