McCollum v. Kmart Corp.
Court of Appeals of Oregon
1Opinion of the CourtHaselton, J.
In this personal injury action, defendant Kmart Corporation appeals from an order that set aside a judgment for defendant and granted plaintiff Ruth McCollum a new trial under ORCP 64 B(l) and (6). Plaintiff defends the trial court’s reasoning, urges, alternatively, that she was entitled to a new trial under ORCP 64 B(4), and also advances, byway of a “cross-assignment of error,” an additional, potential alternative basis for affirmance. We conclude that the trial court erred in granting the motion for new trial on its stated grounds, and we reject plaintiffs alternative contentions.…
2Cases cited29 opinions
- Jackson v. KotterCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2008
- State v. RogersOregon Supreme Court · 2000
- State v. MayfieldOregon Supreme Court · 1987
- Turman v. Central Billing Bureau, Inc.Oregon Supreme Court · 1977
- McCathern v. Toyota Motor Corp.Oregon Supreme Court · 2001
24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- State v. RamozOregon Supreme Court · 2021
- Sjomeling v. LasserCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2012
- McCollum v. KMART CORP.Oregon Supreme Court · 2010
- State v. RamozCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2019
- Markstrom v. Guard Publ'g Co.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 2018
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.