Young v. State

*34DE MUNIZ, P. J.

In this declaratory judgment case, plaintiff challenges the trial court’s determination that the overtime pay provisions of ORS 279.340(1) (1995)1 did not apply to state managerial and executive employees.

At all relevant times, the state2 3employed plaintiff in a salaried position. In 1995, the legislature amended ORS 279.340(1) to include the state in the overtime compensation law; before 1995, that statute referred only to nonstate public employers. See ORS 279.340 (1993) (“Labor directly employed by a county, municipality, municipal corporation, school district or…