Legal Opinion

Matter of Marriage of Denton

Oregon Supreme Court

Decided January 8, 1998No. CC 93C-35739; CA A86943; SC S43977PublishedCited by 58 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtGillette, J.

In this marital dissolution action, the issue presented is whether wife’s contribution to husband’s acquisition of a medical license was sufficiently “material,” “substantial,” and “prolonged,” as those terms are used in ORS 107.105(l)(f), to entitle wife to receive an equitable portion of husband’s enhanced earning capacity resulting from that license as part of the property distribution in the case. The trial court held that wife’s contribution met those statutory criteria, and awarded wife $15,000 per year for as long as she survives and husband continues to work. On appeal by husband, the…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Portland General Electric Co. v. Bureau of Labor & IndustriesOregon Supreme Court · 1993
  2. Goodyear Tire & Rubber Co. v. Tualatin Tire & Auto, Inc.Oregon Supreme Court · 1997
  3. Goodyear Tire & Rubber Co. v. Tualatin Tire & Auto, Inc.Oregon Supreme Court · 1995

3Cited by58 opinions

  1. In Re Marriage of KunzeOregon Supreme Court · 2004
  2. Stevens v. CzerniakOregon Supreme Court · 2004
  3. Dept. of Transportation v. StallcupOregon Supreme Court · 2006
  4. State v. FriesOregon Supreme Court · 2008
  5. Vaughn v. First Transit, Inc.Oregon Supreme Court · 2009

53 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API