Legal Opinion

General Dynamics Corp. v. Superior Court

California Supreme Court

Decided July 18, 1994No. S033640PublishedCited by 98 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

ARABIAN, J.

We granted review to consider an attorney’s status as “in-house” counsel as it affects the right to pursue claims for damages following an allegedly wrongful termination of employment. Specifically, we are asked to decide whether an attorney’s status as an employee bars the pursuit of implied-in-fact contract and retaliatory discharge tort causes of action against the employer that are commonly the subject of suits by non-attorney employees who assert the same claims.

We conclude that, because so-called “just cause” contractual claims are unlikely to implicate values central…

2Cases cited30 opinions

  1. Hishon v. King & SpaldingSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  2. Foley v. Interactive Data Corp.California Supreme Court · 1988
  3. Clark v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1933
  4. Tameny v. Atlantic Richfield Co.California Supreme Court · 1980
  5. Willy v. Coastal Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1992

25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by98 opinions

  1. Lillian Kachmar v. Sungard Data Systems, Inc. Lawrence A. Gross Donna J. PedrickCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1997
  2. PLCM Group, Inc. v. DrexlerCalifornia Supreme Court · 2000
  3. Quelimane Co. v. Stewart Title Guaranty Co.California Supreme Court · 1998
  4. Green v. Ralee Engineering Co.California Supreme Court · 1998
  5. Crews v. Buckman Laboratories International, Inc.Tennessee Supreme Court · 2002

93 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API