Legal Opinion

Oaks Management Corp. v. Superior Court

California Court of Appeal

Decided November 30, 2006No. D047857PublishedCited by 65 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

McCONNELL, P. J.

The issue in this appeal is whether the trial court erred by disqualifying a law firm from representing plaintiffs at trial, based on lender-borrower relationships between two of the firm’s attorneys and a defendant that ended several years before this litigation commenced. Defendant argued the attorneys received his confidential financial information in conjunction with making loans, and plaintiffs could use it against him here, e.g., in making settlement demands.

We find error and grant the petition. Even if the attorneys did receive defendant’s financial information…

2Cases cited31 opinions

  1. People Ex Rel. Deparment of Corporations. v. Speedee Oil Change Systems, Inc.California Supreme Court · 1999
  2. Nymark v. Heart Federal Savings & Loan Ass'nCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1991
  3. Flatt v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1994
  4. Union Bank v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1995
  5. Valley Bank of Nevada v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1975

26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by65 opinions

  1. Lueras v. BAC Home Loans Servicing, LPCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2013
  2. Ragland v. U.S. Bank National Ass'nCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2012
  3. Jolley v. Chase Home Finance, LLCCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2013
  4. Rosenfeld v. JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A.District Court, N.D. California · 2010
  5. Lane v. Vitek Real Estate Industries GroupDistrict Court, E.D. California · 2010

60 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API