Legal Opinion
Federal Deposit Insurance v. Fidelity & Deposit Co.
District Court, S.D. California
Decided May 1, 2000No. 97-CV-1068 W(AJB)PublishedCited by 46 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER GRANTING IN PART AND DENYING IN PART OBJECTIONS TO MAGISTRATE JUDGE’S ORDER
WHELAN, District Judge.
Plaintiff Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation (“FDIC”), acting as receiver of Great American Bank (“GAB”), brings this action under the Financial Institutions Reform, Recovery, and Enforcement Act (“FIRREA”). FDIC seeks to collect on several fidelity bonds issued to GAB that provide coverage against the dishonest or fraudulent acts of GAB’s employees.
On January 10, 2000 FDIC filed a motion for a protective order pursuant to Rule 26(c) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. (Doc. No.…
2Cases cited28 opinions
- Hickman v. TaylorSupreme Court of the United States · 1947
- United States v. ZolinSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
- O'Melveny & Myers v. Federal Deposit InsuranceSupreme Court of the United States · 1994
- Haines v. Liggett Group Inc.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1992
- Atherton v. Federal Deposit Insurance Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1997
23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by46 opinions
- Jadwin v. County of KernDistrict Court, E.D. California · 2011
- Crispin v. Christian Audigier, Inc.District Court, C.D. California · 2010
- In Re: Avantel, S.A.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2003
- Green v. BacaDistrict Court, C.D. California · 2003
- Avalos v. Foster Poultry FarmsDistrict Court, E.D. California · 2011
41 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.