Legal Opinion

Maretz v. 595 Corporate Circle

Supreme Court of Connecticut

Decided September 18, 2001No. SC 16304PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

BORDEN, J.

The dispositive issue in this certified appeal is whether, under General Statutes (Rev. to 1991) § 20-325a (b) (5),1 a listing agreement for real property owned by a partnership that is signed by all of the general partners as agents of the partnership is rendered unenforceable because the partners were not “authorized to act on behalf of the [partnership] ... by a written document executed in the manner provided for conveyances in [General Statutes (Rev. to 1991) §] 47-*1235 ... .”2 3Following our grant of certification to appeal,3 the plaintiff, Levey Miller Maretz, appealed…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. McCutcheon & Burr, Inc. v. BermanSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1991
  2. Commission on Human Rights & Opportunities v. Sullivan AssociatesSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1999
  3. Rostenberg-Doern Co. v. WeinerConnecticut Appellate Court · 1989
  4. Thornton Real Estate, Inc. v. LobdellSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1981
  5. Rich-Taubman Associates v. Commissioner of Revenue ServicesSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1996

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. State v. SalamonSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2008
  2. Maturo v. State Employees Retirement CommissionSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2017
  3. Weldy v. NORTHBROOK CONDOMINIUM ASS'N, INC.Connecticut Appellate Court · 2005
  4. Dow & Condon, Inc. v. Muros North Ltd. PartnershipConnecticut Appellate Court · 2002
  5. Kayla M. v. GreeneConnecticut Appellate Court · 2016

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API