Legal Opinion

Cornhusker Public Power District v. City of Schuyler

Nebraska Supreme Court

Decided June 17, 2005No. S-04-367PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtMcCormack, J.

NATURE OF CASE

Nebraska law allows cities of the first class to annex “contiguous or adjacent lands, lots, tracts, streets, or highways.” Neb. Rev. Stat. § 16-117(1) (Reissue 1997). Cornhusker Public Power District (Cornhusker) challenged in the district court for Colfax County the City of Schuyler’s attempted annexation of certain tracts of land. The court ruled in favor of Cornhusker and enjoined Schuyler from enforcing its ordinance annexing such tracts of land. Schuyler appeals. The primary issue presented is whether

the tracts of land Schuyler attempted to annex are contiguous or adjacent”…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Sanitary & Improvement District 57 v. City of ElkhornNebraska Supreme Court · 1995
  2. Johnson v. City of HastingsNebraska Supreme Court · 1992
  3. Witham v. City of LincolnNebraska Supreme Court · 1933
  4. Adam v. City of HastingsNebraska Supreme Court · 2004
  5. Village of Niobrara v. TichyNebraska Supreme Court · 1954

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. City of Elkhorn v. City of OmahaNebraska Supreme Court · 2007
  2. Marcuzzo v. Bank of the WestNebraska Supreme Court · 2015
  3. Smith v. City of PapillionNebraska Supreme Court · 2005
  4. In Re Sanitary and Imp. Dist. No. 1Nebraska Supreme Court · 2006
  5. County of Sarpy v. City of GretnaNebraska Supreme Court · 2007

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API