Legal Opinion
County of Sarpy v. City of Gretna
Nebraska Supreme Court
Decided February 23, 2007No. S-05-748PublishedCited by 9 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtStephan, J.
This challenge by Sarpy County, Nebraska, to annexation ordinances enacted by the City of Gretna, located within Sarpy County, is before us for the second time. In County of Sarpy v. City of Gretna, 267 Neb. 943, 678 N.W.2d 740 (2004), we concluded that the county had standing to challenge the annexations. We reversed the judgment of dismissal and remanded the cause for further proceedings. Following remand, the district court for Sarpy County conducted a bench trial and found that the annexation ordinances were valid. Sarpy County perfected this timely appeal. Based upon our de novo review…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Sanitary & Improvement District 57 v. City of ElkhornNebraska Supreme Court · 1995
- City of Elkhorn v. City of OmahaNebraska Supreme Court · 2007
- Japp v. Papio-Missouri River Natural Resources DistrictNebraska Supreme Court · 2006
- Johnson v. City of HastingsNebraska Supreme Court · 1992
- Adam v. City of HastingsNebraska Supreme Court · 2004
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- Fickle v. StateNebraska Supreme Court · 2007
- Malchow v. DoyleNebraska Supreme Court · 2008
- County of Sarpy v. City of GretnaNebraska Supreme Court · 2008
- Shoemaker v. ShoemakerNebraska Supreme Court · 2008
- County of Sarpy v. City of PapillionNebraska Supreme Court · 2009
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.