Legal Opinion

Smith v. City of Papillion

Nebraska Supreme Court

Decided November 10, 2005No. S-04-1358PublishedCited by 22 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtGerrard, J.

NATURE OF CASE

After the Papillion City Council took action to amend the City of Papillion’s comprehensive development plan and rezone a parcel of land to accommodate a large commercial development, adjacent landowners brought an action to declare such actions void and enjoin any activity consistent with the rezoning. The district court denied the landowners’ requests, and they appealed. For the following reasons, we affirm the judgment of the district court.

FACTUAL AND PROCEDURAL BACKGROUND

The City of Papillion hired an urban planner to prepare a comprehensive development plan (CDP) for the…

2Cases cited23 opinions

  1. Sun-Brite Car Wash, Inc. v. Board of Zoning & AppealsNew York Court of Appeals · 1987
  2. Kelley v. JohnNebraska Supreme Court · 1956
  3. Whitehead Oil Co. v. City of LincolnNebraska Supreme Court · 1994
  4. Giger v. City of OmahaNebraska Supreme Court · 1989
  5. Bucholz v. City of OmahaNebraska Supreme Court · 1963

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by22 opinions

  1. Myers v. Nebraska Investment CouncilNebraska Supreme Court · 2006
  2. City of Ashland v. Ashland Salvage, Inc.Nebraska Supreme Court · 2006
  3. McClellan v. Board of EqualizationNebraska Supreme Court · 2008
  4. R & S INVESTMENTS v. Auto Auctions, Ltd.Nebraska Court of Appeals · 2006
  5. SKYLINE WOODS HOMEOWNERS v. BroekemeierNebraska Supreme Court · 2008

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API