Marcuzzo v. Bank of the West

Nebraska Advance Sheets MARCUZZO v. BANK OF THE WEST 809 Cite as

290 Neb. 809

motion for recusal. Kalkowski’s assignment of error is with- out merit. CONCLUSION Accordingly, we find that the district court did not err in determining Kalkowski was not entitled to the CIAs and in denying Kalkowski’s motion for recusal. Affirmed. Brian Marcuzzo and Donna Marcuzzo, appellants, v. Bank of the West et al., appellees. ___ N.W.2d ___ Filed May 1, 2015. No. S-14-367. 1. Summary Judgment: Appeal and Error. An appellate court will affirm a lower court’s grant of summary judgment if the pleadings and…