Legal Opinion

Land v. United States

United States Court of Federal Claims

Decided October 13, 1993No. Congressional Reference No. 1-88PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

REPORT OF THE HEARING OFFICER

ROBINSON, Judge:

This matter is before the court on defendant’s motion for summary judgment. Defendant moves the court, pursuant to RCFC 56, for summary judgment on the ground that there is no genuine issue as to any material fact and that it is entitled to judgment as a matter of law. Plaintiffs challenge the motion, urging that the rec*747ord does reflect genuine issues of material fact precluding summary judgment. For the reasons stated below, defendant’s motion is denied.

Factual Background

In 1942, defendant, through the United States Army, established the Rocky…

2Cases cited41 opinions

  1. Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  3. Erie Railroad v. TompkinsSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
  4. Adickes v. S. H. Kress & Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1970
  5. United States v. Diebold, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1962

36 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Kanehl v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 1997
  2. INSLAW, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 1996
  3. Climax, LLC v. Snake River OncologyIdaho Supreme Court · 2010
  4. Banfi Products Corp. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 1997
  5. Bear Claw Tribe, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 1996

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API