Legal Opinion
INSLAW, Inc. v. United States
United States Court of Federal Claims
Decided March 29, 1996No. 95-338XPublishedCited by 25 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
MILLER, Judge.
This congressional reference is before the court on defendant’s motion in limine, or alternatively, for partial summary judgment on the contractual data rights issue. Argument is deemed unnecessary. This case was *298assigned to the court pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1492 (1994), which provides: “Any bill, except a bill for a pension, may be referred by either House of Congress to the chief judge of the United States Court of Federal Claims for a report in conformity with section 2509 of this title.” Section 2509(e) charges the court to proceed “in accordance with the applicable…
2Cases cited40 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- In re Japanese Electronic Products Antitrust LitigationCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1983
- Avia Group International, Inc., (Formerly Pensa, Inc.) v. L.A. Gear California, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1988
35 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by25 opinions
- Kanehl v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 1997
- Stobie Creek Investments, LLC v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2008
- Land Grantors in Henderson, Union v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2005
- Banfi Products Corp. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 1997
- Bear Claw Tribe, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 1996
20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.