R. U. Delapenha & Co. v. United States
United States Customs Court
1Opinion of the Court
Donlon, Judge:
Three protests are here consolidated for purposes of trial. The merchandise, in all three cases, is a packaged food product that is known by the trade name of Bird’s Dessert Powder, product of Great Britain. Entry in the three protests was on February 27,1959, January 7,1960, and April 21,1960, respectively. The collector classified the merchandise of all three entries as a nonenu-*145merated manufactured article, dutiable under paragraph 1558 at a rate of 20 per centum ad valorem.
These three protests, as filed, claimed classification of the merchandise as a starch, not specially…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Chew Hing Lung v. WiseSupreme Court of the United States · 1900
- United States v. MacyCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1916
- United States v. Kurtz, Stuböeck & Co.Court of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1914
- United States v. M. Rice & Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1922
- Rice & Co. v. United StatesCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1920
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Castelazo & Associates Atwood Imports, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1970
- R. U. Delapenha & Co. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1964
- R. U. Delapenha & Co. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1963