Legal Opinion
Interstate Commerce Commission v. Pickard
District Court, W.D. New York
Decided November 28, 1941No. Civil Action 642PublishedCited by 8 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
KNIGHT, District Judge.
This suit is brought under Section 222 (b) of Part II of the Interstate Commerce Act, 49 U.S.C.A. § 322(b), to restrain the defendants, George C. Pickard and Bennie M. Anderson, from operating as motor carriers without authority of law. The plaintiff also seeks to restrain the Jamestown Sterling Corporation from employing said motor carriers in transportation involving such unlawful operations.
The complaint sets out three causes of action: (1) Charging the defendants Pic kard and Anderson, individually and as copartners, in engaging in the transportation of property by…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Georgia Truck System, Inc. v. Interstate Commerce CommissionCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1941
- Holmes v. Railroad CommissionCalifornia Supreme Court · 1925
- Reavley v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1933
- United States v. SteffkeDistrict Court, D. Minnesota · 1940
3Cited by8 opinions
- Plato v. RoudebushDistrict Court, D. Maryland · 1975
- Brooks Transp. Co. v. United StatesDistrict Court, E.D. Virginia · 1950
- United States v. La Tuff Transfer Service, Inc.District Court, D. Minnesota · 1950
- Interstate Commerce Commission v. F & F Truck Leasing Co.District Court, D. Minnesota · 1948
- Taylor v. Interstate Commerce CommissionCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1953
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.