Clapp v. Clapp
Supreme Court of North Carolina
1Opinion of the CourtJohnson, J.
An oral contract to give or devise real estate is void by reason of the statute of frauds, G.S. 22-2, which provides that “all contracts to sell or convey any lands . . . shall be void unless said contract, or some memorandum or note thereof, be put in writing . . .” Grantham v. Grantham, 205 N.C. 363, 171 S.E. 331; Daughtry v. Daughtry, 223 N.C. 528, 27 S.E. 2d 446; Coley v. Dalrymple, 225 N.C. 67, 33 S.E. 2d 477. Cf. Clark v. Butts, 240 N.C. 709, 83 S.E. 2d 855. And it is settled law that a party may rely on the statute of frauds under a general denial. Luton v. Badham, 127 N.C. 96, 37 S.E.…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Grantham v. . GranthamSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1933
- Coley v. . DalrympleSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1945
- Jamerson v. . LoganSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1948
- Luton v. Badham.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1900
- Grady v. . FaisonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1944
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- Pickelsimer Ex Rel. Gash v. PickelsimerSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1962
- Sheffer v. RardinCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2010
- Dunn v. DunnSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1955
- Hicks v. HicksCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1971
- Barnwell v. BarnwellSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1955
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.