Coley v. . Dalrymple
Supreme Court of North Carolina
1Opinion of the CourtStacy, C. J.
The outcome of the case depends upon whether it is made to rest on special contract or on implied assumpsit or quantum meruit. Lawrence v. Hester, 93 N. C., 19. If on the former, it must fail. Graham v. Hoke, 219 N. C., 755, 14 S. E. (2d), 790. If on the latter, it may survive in part. Hayman v. Davis, 182 N. C., 563, 109 S. E., 554.
I. The Special CouNT.
The record is wanting in sufficiency to establish any express contract, such as alleged in the complaint, or to support the jury’s finding on the first issue. Hence, the principal' question, debated on argument and in briefs, namely, whether,…
2Cases cited35 opinions
- McGill v. Town of LumbertonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1939
- Croom v. . Lumber Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1921
- Stokes v. . TaylorSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1889
- Helmstetler v. Duke Power Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1945
- Whichard v. LipeSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1942
30 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by26 opinions
- Croom v. . Lumber Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1921
- Ingold v. Phoenix Assurance Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1949
- Caddell v. CaddellSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1953
- Griffith v. GriffithSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1954
- Hanford v. McSwainSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1949
21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.